The Roman Months: A Calendar Full of Gods
September through December are not named after gods at all; they are just the Latin words for seventh through tenth, fossils of a calendar that once began in March. The Roman month names are a patchwork: some genuinely religious, some disputed even among ancient scholars, and two, July and August, renamed for actual historical men rather than gods.
The old 10-month calendar and why it started in March
Roman tradition held that the earliest calendar, attributed to Romulus, had only ten months and began the year in March, the start of the campaigning and farming season. That would explain why the last four months, September through December, are simply numbered seventh through tenth from a March start, numbering that stuck even after the calendar changed and January became the formal start of the year.
Numa's addition: January and February
Roman tradition credits the legendary second king, Numa Pompilius, with adding two months, Ianuarius and Februarius, to bring the calendar to twelve months and better align it with the lunar year. Ianuarius honored Janus, the god of beginnings and transitions, an apt choice for an opening month. Februarius took its name from februa, the term for the purification rites performed during that month, rites tied to festivals like the Lupercalia. Even after Numa's reform, the pre-Julian Roman calendar remained a lunar-based system prone to drifting out of sync with the actual seasons, and the pontiffs were responsible for periodically inserting an extra intercalary month to correct it, a power they sometimes abused for political reasons, lengthening or shortening a year to extend a friendly magistrate's term or shorten a rival's.
All twelve months at a glance
| Month | Latin name | Root | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | Ianuarius | Janus | High |
| February | Februarius | Februa, purification rites | High |
| March | Martius | Mars | High |
| April | Aprilis | Disputed: possibly aperire, 'to open' (of buds), or linked to Aphrodite via Etruscan influence | Low / disputed |
| May | Maius | Disputed: the goddess Maia, or maiores, 'elders' | Disputed |
| June | Iunius | Disputed: the goddess Juno, or iuniores, 'the young' | Disputed |
| July | Iulius | Julius Caesar, renamed from Quintilis in 44 BC | High (historical event) |
| August | Augustus | Augustus, renamed from Sextilis in 8 BC | High (historical event) |
| September | September | septem, 'seven' | High |
| October | October | octo, 'eight' | High |
| November | November | novem, 'nine' | High |
| December | December | decem, 'ten' | High |
Quintilis becomes Julius
In 44 BC, shortly after Julius Caesar's assassination, the month Quintilis, 'the fifth month,' was renamed Iulius in his honor, the name English still uses as July. The renaming also marked the broader calendar reform Caesar had enacted the previous year, the Julian calendar, which fixed the drifting Roman lunar-solar system into the roughly 365-day structure still underlying the modern calendar.
Sextilis becomes Augustus
Decades later, in 8 BC, the Roman Senate renamed Sextilis, 'the sixth month,' as Augustus, honoring the first emperor during his lifetime. Suetonius records the Senate's stated reasons connecting the month to several of Augustus's major successes. Unlike several other emperors who tried the same move, Augustus's renaming is the one that permanently stuck. The Julian reform the renaming built on, enacted by Julius Caesar in 46 BC with the help of the Alexandrian astronomer Sosigenes, fixed the year at 365 days with a leap day added every fourth year, finally ending the pontiffs' erratic intercalations and producing a calendar close enough to the modern one that most of the world still effectively uses a lightly corrected version of it today, the Gregorian calendar introduced in 1582.
Solid etymology vs. disputed months
It helps to separate months with firm ancient agreement on their god from those ancient writers themselves argued about. January, February, and March have clear, uncontested divine roots. April, May, and June are genuinely disputed: even Varro, writing with direct access to now-lost antiquarian sources, offers more than one competing explanation for some of these names rather than a single confident answer, a caution worth remembering when reading claims about the festivals Ovid describes for these same months.
Common mistakes
A frequent error is assuming September through December honor gods; they do not, they are leftover numbers from the old March-start calendar. Another is stating flatly that April is named for Aphrodite, when ancient sources themselves disagree and the 'opening buds' explanation has at least equal standing. People also sometimes assume every emperor who tried to rename a month succeeded: Caligula, Nero, Commodus, and Domitian all attempted it, and none of those renamings outlasted their reigns, unlike Caesar's and Augustus's. Caligula reportedly wanted September renamed for himself, Nero pushed to rename both April and May, Commodus briefly renamed several months after his own adopted titles, and Domitian renamed September and October after himself; in every one of these cases the Senate or the next emperor simply reverted the name once its namesake was dead or deposed, which is exactly what did not happen with Iulius and Augustus.
Why the numbered months never got renamed again
Despite several emperors' attempts, September through December kept their numerical names, perhaps because later rulers lacked Caesar's and Augustus's combination of political dominance and calendar reform to make a renaming stick, or simply because the habit of naming months after living rulers fell out of favor as the imperial cult itself grew more formalized and cautious about living honors. The Roman months, as a result, remain a genuine mix of religion, disputed etymology, and two permanent monuments to two specific men. That mix is exactly why no single clean rule, 'Roman months are named after gods' or 'Roman months are just numbers,' actually holds up; the truth, as with so much of Roman religious history, depends on checking each month individually against the ancient evidence rather than reaching for a tidy generalization. Readers curious about the specific days within each month, rather than the months themselves, will find the festival-by-festival detail in Ovid's own poetic treatment of the calendar.
Sources
- Ovid, Fasti (Books 1–6) — Poetic treatment of several month names and their associated festivals.
- Varro, De Lingua Latina (Book 6) — Antiquarian discussion and competing theories on Roman month-name etymology.
- Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars (Life of Augustus) — Records the Senate's renaming of Sextilis to Augustus and its stated reasons.
Frequently asked questions
Why does September mean 'seventh month' if it's actually the ninth?
Because the earliest Roman calendar reportedly began the year in March with only ten months. September, meaning 'seventh,' kept its old number even after January and February were added at the start of the year, shifting its actual position.
Is April definitely named after Aphrodite?
No, this is disputed. Ancient sources themselves, including Varro, offer multiple competing explanations, including a connection to the Latin aperire, 'to open,' referring to blooming flowers, alongside the Aphrodite theory.
Why are July and August different from the other Roman months?
Unlike the other ten, which honor gods or are simply numbered, July and August were renamed in honor of specific historical men, Julius Caesar in 44 BC and the emperor Augustus in 8 BC, replacing their earlier names Quintilis and Sextilis.
Did any other Roman emperors rename months after themselves?
Yes. Caligula, Nero, Commodus, and Domitian each attempted to rename one or more months after themselves, but none of those changes survived their reigns, unlike the permanent renamings honoring Julius Caesar and Augustus.